Archive for the 'Digital History & Culture' Category

The Need for More Drag and Drop

Friday, June 25th, 2004

The Need for More Drag and Drop
“One CMO said venture capitalists are reluctant to invest in products that don’t reflect their investment’s “added value.” In other words, “If it works too easily, where’s all that engineering I’m paying for?” Another retold this scenario: As a sales engineer walks out the door one day, he turns around and says to the engineering staff, “Don’t make it too easy, or I’ll be out of a job.”
Yes, you heard it from the horse’s mouth: We can’t make things easier, because our investors and sales people don’t like it that way! These market vagaries conspire to constrain growth in technology innovation and ultimately the entire economy.”

Amen!

The Macintosh Spirit validation

Tuesday, May 25th, 2004

Macintosh validates all i know about creating innovation
Andy Hertzfeld’s amazing ressource about the Macintosh project is always amazing for a digital history freak like me - today’s essay The Macintosh Spirit is about the spirit, values and goals of the team. It validates everything i’ve learned about innovation - worth a quick read…

Deconstructing the Google S-1 ipo filing

Thursday, April 29th, 2004

Deconstructing the Google S-1 ipo filing
The Google IPO mania is here and it appears that Dan Gillmor’s hopes have come through. This seems as if it is a landmark public offering in terms of the company, the attittude and the way the ipo is done. Notes here as i get through the s-1 sec filing:

- the most untraditionel opening of a prospectus. A very strong message from the founders outlining their vision for the company and how they intend to do it their way
- shares have been split into two classes to let the founders and the management retain control. A highly controversial move these days, but imho worth the respect considering how they manage the company. Also a testiment to the apparent battle the founders have had with the vc’s pressing for liquidity
- the WHOLE offering will be a dutch auction model (pioneered by Bill Hambrecht for technology offerings). This means that we won’t see any of the absurd ipo procedures we saw in the bubble and that the market truly will set the valuation. Also that the proceeds will get in Google coffers and not some friends of the investment bankers that flip their shares. But also a highly experimental thing to do with such huge demand. But respect full.
- revenue for the 2003: 961,874,000 $ with a income of 342,464,000 $ before taxes. An income margin of around 35%! Taking into account option charges that probably are temporary the income is over 500,000,000 $ - a margin of 50%.
- revenue for q1 2004: 389,638,000 $. Income: 155,232,000$ before taxes. Just extrapolating the numbers with the growth could mean revenues around 2 billion and income of around 800 million $ before taxes for year 2004.
- total assets above 1 billion $. Total assets after the disclosed estimate of 2,7 billion $ in proceeds from the offering just under 4 billion$. This could get way higher if the auction price gets high (depending on how many insiders cash out in the process - imho the only mixed signal in the offering - but probably a condition from the vc’s).
- proforma book value per share as of march 31,2004: 2,96$
- 1,907 employees.
- orkut is a subsidiary of Google Inc, Orkut LLC.
- Establishment of a Google Foundation with approx 1% equity in Google and 1% of income. Interesting move instead of the founders setting foundations up for themselves. Probably inspired by salesforce.com
- “Between February 2001 and February 2003, the registrant issued 446,000 shares of common stock as consideration for four acquisitions. The acquisition of Pyra (Blogger) is one those four.

All in all. This is the real thing. It feels like reading Netscape’s prospectus in 1995 - but 9 years later with strong values, a good business model, good incomes, true leadership from the founders, a fair distribution model for the shares, a foundation to distribute some of the wealth,etc.
It feels like we’ve come somewhere the last 9 years in terms of how business is integrated into society and humanity. Respect, Larry and Sergey! A lot of people had high expectations for how you would do this since you have a great responsibility on your shoulders since you’ll be kickstarting a new wave of innovation - and you came through - for all of us.
(Short term the media frenzy might take the stock up and down, it might open too high, etc. - but this is a long term play).

Folklore.org: Macintosh Stories

Thursday, January 29th, 2004

Folklore.org: Macintosh Stories
Amazing ressource of stories from the original Macintosh - must read for anyone interested in digital history.

The Click Heard Round The World

Tuesday, January 13th, 2004

Wired 12.01: The Click Heard Round The World
The basic introduction to Engelbart’s 1968 demo.

35th anniversary of DougEngelbart’ “Mother of all demos”

Tuesday, December 9th, 2003

Worth noting:
Today is the 35th anniversary of Doug Engelbart’s “Mother of all demos”.

Copenhagen Interactive

Friday, October 17th, 2003

Copenhagen Interactive. Or Birger Hauge 9.0 or whatever the version number is up to.

The Economist on the invention and emergence of Ethernet

Sunday, October 12th, 2003

The Economist Technology Quarterly, September 6th 2003
The Economist on the invention and emergence of Ethernet.
“As with so many scientific breakthroughs, Mr Metcalfe’s ideas did not so much break new ground as take existing concepts and put them together in a new way.”
“One might argue that Mr Metcalfe’s biggest contribution to Ethernet was not inventing it, but getting Xerox to license it cheaply.”

And my pledge to Dave

Monday, June 30th, 2003

And my pledge to Dave
Give the rest of the industry a way to move forward with RSS, a way to get the creative differences to agree on something uniting. Sit down with the 6-8 core developers and figure out what should be done.

Echo FUD

Monday, June 30th, 2003

Echo FUD
Never before have i seen a process with so much FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) in it as Echo. In a process worth the respect of any Bigco everyone is behind Echo allthough no one knows what it is. But all the the kids are gonna show the obnoxious old uncle who’s really in charge.
Yeah, Dave can be tough to work with at times, but give the man some well deserved credit for his work and his insight.
Let’s not create a new Engelbart - where great insight gets ignored across several generations because of personal issues.
Yes, Dave could have been more open and professional about the standard. His style of maintaning the standard has probably been a bit too adhoc considering how important rss has become, but at the core it’s about Dave’s belief in simplicity which none of the echo believers really understand imho.
Why don’t treat ECHO as a best practice organisation for the implementation of RSS 2.0 instead of trying to create something new just for the benefit of new. Perhaps getting Dave to help with rolling the absolute necessary changes into the 2.0 spec.

And why doesn’t anything happen in the spirit of openness in weblogs - what are the real motivations, what are the feelings and attitudes. Everything is going on in silence.

Sam Ruby might be a very nice guy - but untill proven otherwise i trust Dave Winer more. Many years of sharing his insights in openness, 20+ industry experience with standard setting bodies, what works in the real world, his contributions to soap, etc.

My simple pledge: “Show some respect “kids” and make a win-win situation for both you and Dave! You have something to learn from each other.”