Echo FUD
Never before have i seen a process with so much FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) in it as Echo. In a process worth the respect of any Bigco everyone is behind Echo allthough no one knows what it is. But all the the kids are gonna show the obnoxious old uncle who’s really in charge.
Yeah, Dave can be tough to work with at times, but give the man some well deserved credit for his work and his insight.
Let’s not create a new Engelbart - where great insight gets ignored across several generations because of personal issues.
Yes, Dave could have been more open and professional about the standard. His style of maintaning the standard has probably been a bit too adhoc considering how important rss has become, but at the core it’s about Dave’s belief in simplicity which none of the echo believers really understand imho.
Why don’t treat ECHO as a best practice organisation for the implementation of RSS 2.0 instead of trying to create something new just for the benefit of new. Perhaps getting Dave to help with rolling the absolute necessary changes into the 2.0 spec.
And why doesn’t anything happen in the spirit of openness in weblogs - what are the real motivations, what are the feelings and attitudes. Everything is going on in silence.
Sam Ruby might be a very nice guy - but untill proven otherwise i trust Dave Winer more. Many years of sharing his insights in openness, 20+ industry experience with standard setting bodies, what works in the real world, his contributions to soap, etc.
My simple pledge: “Show some respect “kids” and make a win-win situation for both you and Dave! You have something to learn from each other.”